How is Sola Scriptura incoherent?

Later, Tertullian would lay the foundations of the Trinity.

The New Testament identifies Jesus. Literally, spelling it out in Acts 3.

John 20:17] Jesus said to her, “Do not cling to Me, for I have not yet ascended to My Father; but go to My brethren and say to them, ‘I am ascending to My Father and your Father, and to My God and your God.’ ”

Why has no country adopted the SA80/L85 rifle?

So, how does that affect the Athanasian Christian doctrine of the Trinity?

For example, Jesus has a God …

Considering that the traditions stem from interpretations based off the writings, sola scriptura would be the means to test the coherency of the traditions.

It’s been over a month since I stopped taking sertraline but why do I still feel side effects like brain zaps and anxiety mood changes? The root cause of anxiety it’s your thinking and I perfectly master that better than before so it’s hard lately.

But it was not until the efforts to create a uniform Christianity at Nicaea that the concept became the accepted tradition, to create a universal (catholic) interpretation of the writings.

Nuda scriptura is scripture alone. Sola scriptura looks at the writings and the traditions, with the writings (source of the traditions) having greater relevance.

A Trinity was first mentioned as G-d, His Word and His Wisdom, by Theophilus of Antioch.

If I get served by someone else's papers, am I legally required to inform the person that they got served, or the court that they served the wrong person?

But if you read it through the filter of the traditions of a Trinity, you will miss it (like many miss Jesus telling Mary about Mary’s G-d being Jesus’s G-d). That is incoherent.